[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples
Yes. @xml:src + @xml:type + @xml:hreflang Nothing says you can't recombine or add other of the affordance "atoms" to build your own media type semantics. I thought about adding xml:tsrc, but I thought that was going too far. What needs to be done with a processed @xml:tref is to go and get the resource, so by that time there is no need to have any other semantics because the inclusion or fetching semantics would be probably carrried by either the element name or other attributes that could be added by the media designer. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Sokolov [mailto:sokolov@ifactory.com] > Sent: June 25, 2012 11:37 > To: David Lee > Cc: Rushforth, Peter; Andrew Welch; Uche Ogbuji; xml-dev@lists.xml.org > Subject: Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore > the basic principles of MicroXML" > > > > On 06/25/2012 09:44 AM, David Lee wrote: > > > > There is the camp that believes XML should be agnostic about the > > application layer And there is the camp that believes XML > should be tailored to make its use in a web browser more usable. > > > Where do you think include semantics fall? Seems to me they > could inhabit either or both (parser and application) layers. > Peter: does your proposal address inclusion (like some > "micro" analogue to xs:include)? > > -Mike Sokolov >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|