[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples
>> There is no need for it, just as there is no need for inbuilt >> linking in full fat xml. > > Oh yes there is. But don't take my word for it - as Jim Webber, Savas Parastatidis and Ian Robinson state in their book [1]: It's been discussed quite frequently on the various lists, and the usual conclusion is that links are best modelled in the xml using whatever is suitable to the domain, and the actual linking functionality is provided in the view layer. >> The single purpose of a simplified xml was to make it easier >> for non-xml developers to create and process. > > You mean web developers, don't you? > > I believe MicroXML arose in concept out of this post by James Clark: ...which may or may not have arisen from this thread: http://markmail.org/message/kxrg3tifg4k4fyj6 -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|