[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: MicroXML and &

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
• Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 23:38:51 -0400

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> On the other hand, the kind of complexity that extra lines in a table
> cause is trivial, perhaps negligible after the first entry.   (You
> wouldn't implement a  large lookup table as an if-then-else chain,
> surely.)

It was a joke.  As I said before, I wouldn't add all those entities to
MicroXML, because it would break backward compatibility.

I just thought of a way of doing it, though: allow an extension to
the DOCTYPE that specifies the home on the W3C page of the entities.
Of course, MicroXML parsers won't actually load that; it'll just make
them switch on the entities.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan
Linguistics is arguably the most hotly contested property in the academic
realm. It is soaked with the blood of poets, theologians, philosophers,
philologists, psychologists, biologists and neurologists, along with
whatever blood can be got out of grammarians. - Russ Rymer

• References:
  • "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principles of MicroXML"
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • MicroXML and &
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>