[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabu
>Notice that Schematron isn't consistent in its naming convention. Is that a bad thing? Yes. >Is it a good thing to have a consistent naming convention? Yes. >Why does XML Schema and XSLT have different naming conventions? My guess would be that it's due to ignorance (I didn't know they were doing that), but it could be arrogance (Those guys don't know what they're doing, and/or Who cares what X is doing, no-one will ever use X anyway). Those are only guesses. Untangling the history is rarely possible. >They are both W3C technologies. Does the W3C not have a policy on naming markup? It probably does by now, it has on most things. But it certainly didn't have in the days when you could get a spec out in 6 months. Which might not be a coincidence. Michael Kay Saxonica
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|