XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - February, 2012

Play the video

Re: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 1 Feb 2012 08:40:02 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication, From "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com> on 1 Feb 2012 12:09:04 -0000
Re: Creating Context-Dependent Data Models, From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 15:54:52 -0000
How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 1 Feb 2012 19:30:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?, From Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 19:42:09 -0000
- Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changingtechnologies?, From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 1 Feb 2012 19:56:42 -0000
- Re: How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing technologies?, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2012 20:19:48 -0000
SGML/XML/XSLT Tools developer/IETM developer Opportunity, From Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com> on 2 Feb 2012 00:40:54 -0000
RE: book for beginners, From Norm Birkett <Norm.Birkett@reval.com> on 2 Feb 2012 15:16:40 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: book for beginners, From Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org> on 6 Feb 2012 12:13:30 -0000
Schematron and RNG, RNC, From Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 12:18:17 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC, From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 3 Feb 2012 16:05:21 -0000
Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Feb 2012 14:49:02 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2012 16:00:46 -0000
- Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 17:23:28 -0000
- Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies, From Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> on 3 Feb 2012 19:09:31 -0000
- Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 20:30:36 -0000
- Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies, From Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> on 4 Feb 2012 01:19:40 -0000
- Re: Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XMLvocabularies, From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 4 Feb 2012 21:58:08 -0000
Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 3 Feb 2012 19:14:38 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2012 20:11:21 -0000
- Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existingXML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2012 23:04:24 -0000
- Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com> on 4 Feb 2012 03:01:58 -0000
Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From "=?utf-8?b?Vy4gSHVnaCBDaGF0ZmllbGQ=?=" <csi2000@urbanmarket.com> on 3 Feb 2012 20:28:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From cbullard@hiwaay.net on 3 Feb 2012 20:37:42 -0000
- RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 4 Feb 2012 00:16:38 -0000
XML data sets with (known) data quality problems, From Helena Galhardas <helena.galhardas@ist.utl.pt> on 6 Feb 2012 13:44:13 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: XML data sets with (known) data quality problems, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 14:02:47 -0000
PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type, From Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2012 15:31:34 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 6 Feb 2012 15:49:20 -0000
- Re: PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type, From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 6 Feb 2012 16:04:59 -0000
[ANN] BaseX 7.1: The XMLPrague 2012 Edition, From Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2012 23:43:55 -0000
Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5, From Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> on 10 Feb 2012 10:26:29 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 10 Feb 2012 10:42:11 -0000
What is "syntactic identity"? What is "surface syntax"?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 12 Feb 2012 11:34:24 -0000
Followups by message-id references
functional databases noodling ..., From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 14 Feb 2012 08:57:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: functional databases noodling ..., From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Feb 2012 17:31:40 -0000
- Re: functional databases noodling ..., From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 14 Feb 2012 17:57:56 -0000
What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?, From Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 14 Feb 2012 16:29:57 -0000
[ Conference ] What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Feb 2012 18:38:03 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: [ Conference ] What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?, From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 22 Feb 2012 00:56:40 -0000
RE: [ Conference ] What is Good =?UTF-8?Q?XML=3F=20How=20Can=20?==?UTF-8?Q?We=20Tell=3F?=, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 05:42:08 -0000
CAMV validation framework v2.01 now available, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 05:52:11 -0000
New CAMeditor XML open source toolkit release 2.1.1 and Podcast available., From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 05:52:54 -0000
RE: Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 06:03:33 -0000
RE: Stability of schemas -- frequency of versioning, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 16 Feb 2012 06:21:07 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Stability of schemas -- frequency of versioning, From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2012 06:44:34 -0000
functional databases noodling ..., From Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 16 Feb 2012 20:34:43 -0000
RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax", From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 20 Feb 2012 12:49:26 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax", From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 20 Feb 2012 14:35:36 -0000
- Re: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete syntax", From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 20 Feb 2012 17:03:57 -0000
RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XMLvocabulary or create one's own tag naming =?UTF-8?Q?convention=3F?=, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 20 Feb 2012 19:25:08 -0000
[ANN] Qizx 4.4p1 is available, From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 22 Feb 2012 17:08:21 -0000
Formatting Processing Instructions, From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 22 Feb 2012 20:22:46 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: Formatting Processing Instructions, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 22 Feb 2012 20:31:12 -0000
- Re: Formatting Processing Instructions, From "Betty Harvey" <harvey@eccnet.com> on 22 Feb 2012 21:21:17 -0000
A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plots thepoints on a graph and connects the dots?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Feb 2012 21:19:11 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plots the points on a graph and connects the dots?, From "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com> on 23 Feb 2012 21:46:16 -0000
- Re: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input andplots the points on a graph and connects the dots?, From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Feb 2012 21:57:28 -0000
- RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plotsthe points on a graph and connects the dots? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], From <Nicholas.Ardlie@ga.gov.au> on 23 Feb 2012 22:36:23 -0000
- RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and plotsthe points on a graph and connects the dots?, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 23 Feb 2012 22:41:47 -0000
Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Feb 2012 16:31:17 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 24 Feb 2012 17:09:05 -0000
- Re: Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 24 Feb 2012 17:21:43 -0000
wispr, From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2012 10:55:36 -0000
When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science ofcreating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching,learning, and using., From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 25 Feb 2012 19:43:13 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching, learning, and using., From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 25 Feb 2012 20:01:24 -0000
- Re: When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art andscience of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching,learning, and using., From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 25 Feb 2012 20:35:03 -0000
- RE: When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching, learning, and using., From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 25 Feb 2012 21:18:33 -0000
RE: When is an XML vocabulary too =?UTF-8?Q?complex=3F=20The=20?==?UTF-8?Q?art=20and=20science=20of=20creating=20large=2C=20complex=20voca?==?UTF-8?Q?bularies=20that=20are=20amenable=20to=20teaching=2C=20learning?==?UTF-8?Q?=2C=20and=20using=2E?=, From <w3c@drrw.info> on 26 Feb 2012 02:16:47 -0000
What does "optional" mean?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Feb 2012 14:11:38 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: What does "optional" mean?, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 26 Feb 2012 14:31:38 -0000
- Re: What does "optional" mean?, From Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2012 14:52:18 -0000
- Re: What does "optional" mean?, From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 26 Feb 2012 16:20:30 -0000
- Re: What does "optional" mean?, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2012 16:54:11 -0000
- Re: What does "optional" mean?, From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 26 Feb 2012 20:45:16 -0000
Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified Chinese, From Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 09:06:25 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Message not availableFollowups by message-id references
  - Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified Chinese, From Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2012 10:09:07 -0000
- Re: Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vsSimplified Chinese, From John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> on 27 Feb 2012 15:38:37 -0000
XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question, From David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:06:42 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 28 Feb 2012 18:12:59 -0000
- Re: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question, From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2012 18:31:05 -0000
RE: XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 28 Feb 2012 18:57:43 -0000
Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Feb 2012 13:08:01 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 13:21:58 -0000
- Re: Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata?, From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 13:33:38 -0000
The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins, From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Feb 2012 14:59:18 -0000
Followups by message-id references
- Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretationbegins, From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 15:07:51 -0000
- Re: The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation begins, From Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Feb 2012 16:18:03 -0000

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.0b2

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >