[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: what's missing in XML? What's coming?

• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
• To: cbullard@hiwaay.net
• Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:12:40 +0000

> It may be inevitable that XML becomes not just markup on the web, but only
> markup on the web, meaning it may be time for military technical publishing
> to reconsider it's early adopter commitments to markup.  It takes years to
> create and publish the guidance documents, the XSD is barely documented
> despite being hundreds of pages long, making substantial post-validation
> contributions and creating layouts, resolving references, etc. vital to
> follow-on products (say, Class III and IV IETMs).

What about s1000d?  That's been around for years... I worked on the
IETM for Eurofighter as my first job after uni :)  After that it's
been pretty much the same task just in different industries - medical,
finance, publishing, government... it's all pretty much the same, just
with different text nodes.



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: what's missing in XML? What's coming?
    • From: cbullard@hiwaay.net

• References:
  • Re: what's missing in XML? What's coming?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
  • Re: what's missing in XML? What's coming?
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
  • Re: what's missing in XML? What's coming?
    • From: cbullard@hiwaay.net