[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: what's missing in XML? What's coming?
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote: > 2) Clearer story on how to use the ISO/MathML entity sets along with XML > Schemas, or with no schemas. I often hear "XML Schemas does not support > entities, so I cannot use entities with XML Schemas" or vice versa. > Preferably, build the default mappings of the entities into XML. Adding entities to XML without DTDs would break the compatibility of new documents with old parsers. I think entities alone are not worth such a discontinuity. If there's a discontinuity that makes new documents potentially incompatible with old parser (but old documents stay compatible with new parsers), I think it makes sense to move to well-defined non-Draconian processing (XML5-style) while at it. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|