[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Schema question

• From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:05:19 +0000

OK, maybe it is impossible to get it perfect but I updated
the MicroXSD subset of W3C XML Schema and gave it a
version number '2012'  - "future-looking", "going-forward" :-)

I have posted it on my blog
http://stephengreenxml.blogspot.com/2011/02/microxsd.html

Comments welcome

----
Stephen D Green



On 01/03/2011, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 17:10, Stephen Green wrote:
>> Last time I looked
>> there didn't seem to be anything serious that would run RNC or RNG in .NET
>> though:-(
>
> That was Evan's point.
>
> rather than trying to pull off the impossible of defining a small sane
> subset of the monster that is XSD, just define a small sane subset of
> Relax NG and consider trang just as a compilation step.
>
> If your microxml instance is constrained by a relax ng schema, which
> also has an automatically generated version using XSD syntax, it really
> doesn't matter whether on a given platform you use the rnc or xsd file
> at run time.
>
> As it happens though
>
> http://www.relaxng.org/
>
> lists two .NET relaxng validators, although perhpaps you don't consider
> them "serious" (I haven't tried either of them personally).
>
> David
>
>
>

• References:
  • Re: XML Schema question
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Schema question
    • From: Evan Lenz <Evan.Lenz@marklogic.com>
  • Re: XML Schema question
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Schema question
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>