[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why Use anyURI

• From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:28:40 +0100

> Is Michael saying that the XML Schema spec is so large and has so many
> problems it has actually been effectively unmaintainable for the last five
> years?
>
I wouldn't say it's unmaintainable - but it's certainly a spec where 
adding features without introducing bugs is challenging.
>> When I saw that this was the situation, I decided to stop moaning from
>> the sidelines and join the WG. The situation might be different if more
>> people had done the same.
> ?? Sending in serious comments is "moaning"?
By "moaning", I didn't mean sending in comments, I meant complaining 
about the time taken to respond to them.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au

• References:
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Why Use anyURI
    • From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au