[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: PostScript language, why Turing complete? [was: Re: [xml-d

• From: Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:59:55 +0200

Jim DeLaHunt schrieb am 12.04.2010 um 12:09:28 (-0700):

> Apologies for the digression from XML discussions, but perhaps this 
> historical perspective is useful general education for some readers.

It was the kind of digression that are worth the subscription cost
(time) for an entire month. Thanks!

-- 
Michael Ludwig

• References:
  • RE: RE: Declarative programming requires a different mindset
    • From: "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@ifactory.com>
  • PostScript language, why Turing complete? [was: Re: RE:Declarative programming requires a different mindset]
    • From: Jim DeLaHunt <from.xml-dev@jdlh.com>