[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xlink 1.1

• From: David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:01:09 -0800

That is up to the implementors, and I suspect they could use the IRI 
support.

The point being is that standards no matter how small and how much of 
niche serve their purpose, and they do need to be updated from time to 
time.  Maybe it isn't fitting your use case or your particular interest, 
but I'm for one am glad to see the specs getting attention.  If nothing 
else it brings them up to date with the needs now by some in the 
community that need them.

Dave

On 03/01/2010 02:50 PM, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> David Carver wrote:
>> Simon, xlink also appears in the Open Office specs as well.
>>
>> http://oreilly.com/pub/h/2097
>
> Do they need an update spec?  Are they likely to update the spec and 
> software for a 1.1?
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

• References:
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com>
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>