[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xlink 1.1
David Carver wrote: > That is up to the implementors, and I suspect they could use the IRI > support. It's still not clear to me that the IRI support does anything but explicitly require something that was possible before. > The point being is that standards no matter how small and how much of > niche serve their purpose, and they do need to be updated from time to > time. Maybe it isn't fitting your use case or your particular interest, > but I'm for one am glad to see the specs getting attention. If nothing > else it brings them up to date with the needs now by some in the > community that need them. I guess that means we'll eventually be seeing updates of a wide variety of specs that see relatively little use. That's not all bad. In the case of XLink, though, it really highlighted for me that even a spec that utterly failed to build a community is still sort of somehow marching along. Perhaps XPointer 1.1 is next. -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|