[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xlink 1.1

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• To: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
• Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:19:31 -0500

Dave Pawson wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-xlink11-20100225/Overview-diff10.html  diff 
> to 1.0
> 
> PR http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/

Um, why?

Is the shift from URI to IRI that important?

Are there users of XLink demanding revision?

I would have liked to see XLink succeed, but I think it's pretty clear 
that it didn't.  Zombies do walk the earth lately, but I can't figure 
out what's re-animating this one.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: Micah Dubinko <Micah.Dubinko@marklogic.com>

• References:
  • xlink 1.1
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>