[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xlink 1.1

• From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:39:31 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simon St.Laurent writes:

>> PR http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/
>
> Um, why?
>
> Is the shift from URI to IRI that important?

It is the _World Wide_ Web, so yes.

> Are there users of XLink demanding revision?

In one respect, yes: XLink 1.1 defines a simple profile, and allows
the use of xlink:href without an accompanying xlink:type.  As a result
of this change such usage, which is already widespread in SVG and
DocBook, becomes conformant.  AKA paving the footpaths.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLiOhXkjnJixAXWBoRAnslAJ0XELUgR2GPWOVxBcw7D+6KJFXl5wCfSqVJ
9DuxSRXVnkL52MmO7m3eh3I=
=vAKV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

• References:
  • xlink 1.1
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: xlink 1.1
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>