[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Wikipedia on XML

• From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
• To: "'Elliotte Rusty Harold'" <elharo@ibiblio.org>, "'Michael Kay'" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:52:07 -0500

Elliotte is right. The DTD formally ensures that well-formedness is not the
single possible basis of acceptance of an XML instance.  Preferences for how
that is documented seem to break down when describing why that is necessary.


len


From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@ibiblio.org] 
 
No, I don't think that's sufficient. FDTDs are fundamentally
integrated into the design of an XML parser. They are not optional
pieces one can ignore. Nor are they just a schema language either.
They have noticeable effects on a document's infoset even in the
absence of validation. Yes, in hindsight, this was a mistake; but it's
not one we can ignore or sweep under the rug, much as we might wish
things were otherwise. :-(

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>

• References:
  • Re: Wikipedia on XML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>