[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Creating a single XML vocabulary that is appropriately cus

• From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:15:36 -0400

 
Steve Newcomb wrote:

> In retrospect, it seems possible that the W3C's 
> focus on machine-to-machine  communication and 
> AI left little room for questions about human 
> issues, like the issue of how to deal with the 
> fact that top-down authority over document types 
> simply can't work across diverse human communities. 
> This story is very far from being over.


And Len Bullard wrote:

> Given my druthers, I'd rather maintain multiple 
> schemas over trying to convince multiple groups 
> with different semantics in the same community 
> that they should converge.  The mammal problems 
> are the most expensive.


"top-down authority over document types simply can't 
 work across diverse human communities"

"The mammal [human] problems are the most expensive"


These are very thought-provoking comments.  

I would be appreciative if you - Steve and 
Len (or anyone) - would elaborate upon these comments.  
I am eager to have my eyes opened to new ways of
thinking and dealing with information.

/Roger 

• References:
  • Creating a single XML vocabulary that is appropriately customized to different sub-groups within a community
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Creating a single XML vocabulary that is appropriately customized to different sub-groups within a community
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: Creating a single XML vocabulary that is appropriately customized to different sub-groups within a community
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Creating a single XML vocabulary that is appropriatelycustomized to different sub-groups within a community
    • From: Steve Newcomb <srn@c...>