[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset of
> > 1) bind typed datas. Although this is not about validation but rather > for applications, one could imagine to involve a typed data in an > assertion ; I think that is dependent on an application being written that uses Schematron to do datatype binding. One of the differences between Schematron and XML Schema is that with XML Schema you are assured (sort of) that your 'objects' have the complete structure provided. Whereas in Schematron you do not have this assurance. I think however that in a language like JavaScript getting around this difficult would be easy, and in a language like C# it would be horrendous. >I don't know how Schematron could take care of that ; in any > case, before binding typed datas, Schematron cannot defined custom typed > datas http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/10/converting_xml_schemas_to_sche_4.html > > 3) Schematron doesn't act on content models (that is to say to what is > allowed to find at some place) : within an editor, one can propose an > element that Schematron would refuse ; for this reason, acting on > content models is certainly more reliable or more smart... I think that depends on the editor implementing it surely? Actually also on the large 1 GB documents I guess there is an implementation out there, if you run the implementation through the DataPower XML Accelerator or something like that http://www-306.ibm.com/software/integration/datapower/xa35 maybe IBM should focus on that in their marketing. :) Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|