[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Is DOM more efficient than SAX for smaller xml instances?
bryan rasmussen wrote: > I seem to remember once, long ago, reading something showing DOM was > more efficient than SAX for small XML instances - small being approx > 40 kb. It's true. All you have to do is look at the charts: <http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=DOM&t=5y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=SAX> Seems that SAX got off to a good start, but DOM has clearly predominated (please pardon the pun). Also note that DOM is popular in Alabama, while SAX predominates (again, please pardon the pun) in Virginia. Then again, Morgan Stanley just recently bought SAX, so one should expect its fortunes to change. /Jelks
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|