[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RE: Is DOM more efficient than SAX for smaller xml instanc
If I remember DOM predominated is a generic tree parser - http://www.idealliance.org/papers/extreme/Proceedings/html/2004/Gorman01/EML2004Gorman01.html Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On 8/26/06, Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@j...> wrote: > bryan rasmussen wrote: > > I seem to remember once, long ago, reading something showing DOM was > > more efficient than SAX for small XML instances - small being approx > > 40 kb. > > It's true. All you have to do is look at the charts: > > <http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=DOM&t=5y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=SAX> > > Seems that SAX got off to a good start, but DOM has clearly predominated > (please pardon the pun). > > Also note that DOM is popular in Alabama, while SAX predominates (again, > please pardon the pun) in Virginia. > > Then again, Morgan Stanley just recently bought SAX, so one should expect > its fortunes to change. > > > /Jelks > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|