[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Strict DOCTYPEs are wrong, use them only for debugging
On Jun 17, 2006, at 18:47, Frans Englich wrote: > According to this guy: > > "I see more and more websites using strict DOCTYPES, apparently > webdevelopers > have some misguided notion that this is most correct thing to do and > guaranties the most consistent result. Nothing could be more wrong!" > > http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2097 > > But what do you think? First, I think this is off-topic for this list. See http://hsivonen.iki.fi/doctype/#xml I strongly disagree with the conclusions about the Standards Mode. (Please don't call it "strict mode". It gives people wrong ideas.) If you are using IE 5 / Netscape 4-era features only, the Quirks Modes in various browsers may be relatively stable for you. However, assuming that using new features in the Quirks Mode is somehow smarter than using them in the Standards Mode is just bogus. There's no reason to believe that new CSS features work consistently in the Quirks Modes of various browsers. The author is right that your stuff breaks if you rely on bugs in the Standards Mode. Indeed, that is correct. However, the right solution is not to use the Quirks Mode but the get a clue so that you know what you are doing, so that you don't rely on bugs. (Yes, I am biased, because I've been promoting the Standards Mode for something like six years now.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@i... http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|