[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Java NVDL implementation

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
• Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:41:41 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KZwb4Vu/+S6O5XfJ7JP79Dc+22STpnMF1qkbhPCNwEh36BHjuL1NmbLsLpU9PVm8UOdDcWyqaqHVn+LuU4gj2oXIw6jeJVlpzx6qIqr1O93x5BlAAunNT47KzVj1/tN1ZouJYLvgix1KYwF59/fS/HizJs1viBNU31bh40JjTlA=
• In-reply-to: <445F0489.6080308@k...>
• References: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F45F473BF@M...> <3bb44c6e0605070833p2bbefcafu1749166dc66a0e9c@m...> <7.0.1.0.2.20060507185821.02add718@C...> <3bb44c6e0605071047r7c089abavfd570d951b090580@m...> <445E3971.4050303@k...> <3bb44c6e0605071218o31375616s5551c972160c6cea@m...> <445E60E1.9060005@k...> <3bb44c6e0605071433v17fd9e9an12ef352f5c3f6449@m...> <88aed1ea0605071444m3c1486ch6c223d9cdb42ef43@m...> <445F0489.6080308@k...>

I was kinda hoping that JNVDL was going to do a bit more for me (like
providing an aggregated view of all of the validation errors from all
of the validators called, in a standard vocabulary (maybe even
allowing me to define what that vocabulary should be in some way) -
and, if I want it, the results for each namespace individually). When
I think of COTS tooling I don't normally expect to write half of the
implementation myself ;-). I'm not criticising the potential of what
JNDVL currently has to offer (that is exactly what many on this thread
have had to produce custom implementations of for some time (had I
known about NVDL earlier I would have changed ours to use this
vocabulary), just looking for more ...

On 08/05/06, Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> wrote:
> Fraser Goffin wrote:
> > In that case, I would like :-
> >
> > Nvdl.Instance.getValidationErrorsAsXml(namespace)
>
> Why ErrorHandler is not enough for you? I don't think that JNVDL should
> change XML APIs which are in use for years (OTOH this doen't mean that I
> like JAXP ;-)
>
>                                Jirka
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@k...     http://www.kosek.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
>      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
>        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Nejbližší termíny školení:
>        ** DocBook 15.-17.5.2006 ** XSL-FO 12.-13.6.2006 **
>     ** XSLT 23.-26.10.2006 ** XML schémata 13.-15.11.2006 **
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   http://xmlguru.cz    Blog mostly about XML for English readers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
  • Re: Java NVDL implementation
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Previous by thread: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Next by thread: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread