[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Java NVDL implementation
Fraser Goffin said: > I was kinda hoping that JNVDL was going to do a bit more for me (like > providing an aggregated view of all of the validation errors from all > of the validators called, in a standard vocabulary (maybe even > allowing me to define what that vocabulary should be in some way) - > and, if I want it, the results for each namespace individually). I think the WG would be happy to consider adding a standard message reporting format, if someone contributed it. One thing holding us back is the desire to have running code, but I guess this is a quite well known issue. What would be great is if XML-DEVers could cobble together something, for example a set of requirements or a draft. Would you prefer the messages be given in terms of line numbers or XPaths? Schematron has a standard reporting format already: http://www.schematron.com/iso/P20.html > When > I think of COTS tooling I don't normally expect to write half of the > implementation myself ;-). Standards very often on specify half the necessary picture: XML & SGML for example. Cheers Rick Jelliffe Member WG1/SC34/JTC1
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|