[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Performance in a Transacation

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• From: Jaakko Kangasharju <jkangash@h...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:59:48 +0200
• Cancel-lock: sha1:LIPtkTxJH7Lcs2tT+/ONt1AD+IE=
• Mail-copies-to: nobody
• Mail-followup-to: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
• References: <31980.60.229.226.213.1143118064.squirrel@i...><auto-000097183407@m...><20060324062228.591b7e8d.olpa@x...><442378B6.5060206@a...> <442382C8.9030906@z...><442397C4.1070704@a...>
• Sender: news <news@s...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> writes:

> Last year I think there were reports of good speed ups in parsing in
> Java jsut from re-using SAX objects. (I think the research was
> academic from Eastern Europe, sorry no references.)

Do you mean the paper "An Adaptive, Fast and Safe XML Parser Based on
Byte Sequences Memorization" (http://www2005.org/cdrom/docs/p692.pdf)
by Toshiro Takase and others that was at the WWW conference last year?
Their parser caches the SAX events generated from a sequence of bytes
and then replays those events when encountering the same bytes (of
course taking into account context like prefix mappings).  They report
speedups of up to 70% compared to Piccolo.

-- 
Jaakko Kangasharju, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Hi!  I'm a signature virus!  Copy me into your .signature to help
me spread

• References:
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Next by Date: RE: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Next by thread: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread