[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?

• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...>
• Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:14:56 -0700
• Cc: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>, "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4410A7E0.8010904@d...>
• References: <OF6A2E3DA1.8708BF87-ON8525712C.004EDE14-8525712C.005013A6@u...><4410A7E0.8010904@d...>

Probably not teco, though!
    Jim

At 3/9/2006 03:10 PM, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>Richard Salz wrote:
>>I find it hard to believe that folks take this serious.  Perhaps they can 
>>also resolve the which editor is best, now that we've been told how to 
>>choose a programing language.  Perhaps we'll see a PhD thesis on this soon.
>>
>
>By the Rule of Least Power, it must certainly be vi. Or perhaps edlin.

========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL)     Phone: +1.801.942.0144
   Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor    Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation        Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive      Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA          Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
=  Facts are facts.   But any opinions expressed are the opinions      =
=  only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody   =
=  else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand.  =
======================================================================== 

• References:
  • RE: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Next by Date: RE: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Previous by thread: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread