[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid?
I think the spec is quite clear that you can validly derive xs:string by restriction from union(xs:string, ...) Generally, if XMLSpy differs from Xerces, XMLSpy is usually wrong. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: David P. Nesbitt [mailto:david_p_nesbitt@y...] > Sent: 10 January 2005 15:17 > To: Michael Kay; xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid? > > Michael, > > Thanks for the response. > > --- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote: > > > The schema is valid according to Xerces, XSV, and > > Saxon. What exactly is > > XMLSpy complaining about? > > XMLSpy complains about the stringConstantExpr. It > highlights the <xsd:element name="value" > type="xsd:string"/> and says: > > "Simple type 'xs:string' is not validly derived from > 'constantValueType'." > > http://apps.gotdotnet.com/xmltools/xsdvalidator/Default.aspx > says the following: > > Validation error: > > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error > occurred at , (75, 3). > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error > occurred at , (93, 3). > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error > occurred at , (66, 3). > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An error > occurred at , (84, 3). > > I am interested on what you think of these errors. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|