[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid?

• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid?
• From: "David P. Nesbitt" <david_p_nesbitt@y...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:30:12 -0800 (PST)
• Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=1I1wt2zBb1hCyHyDI4S64CuaqIs9nITvNFqC3QSawBEj+YBG1coNfsxYtEqPb0WNLQ+klAdj8ws3spJ9t0IvBJZzOzW9EemoofdLE8onmAxQYySH+7xiCgS4u6TC/oHKaQwjfnJ2Hg+MvZYX/NomE3cnzfvLOxb03Lpe1MYFDHQ= ;
• In-reply-to: <E1Co20V-00075I-00@u...>

Michael,

Thanks for the insight.  I will try to submit a bug
against XMLSPY when I get a chance.

On the subject of an updted xqueryx.xsd, which it
sounds like you are involved with, there seems to be
one bug in the current version. "comparisonOpTypes"
seems to have ">=" twice and is missing ">".

As always, I appreciate your help.

Regards,
Dave

--- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:

> I think the spec is quite clear that you can validly
> derive xs:string by
> restriction from union(xs:string, ...) 
> 
> Generally, if XMLSpy differs from Xerces, XMLSpy is
> usually wrong.
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David P. Nesbitt
> [mailto:david_p_nesbitt@y...] 
> > Sent: 10 January 2005 15:17
> > To: Michael Kay; xml-dev@l...
> > Subject: RE:  XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0
> (XQueryX) invalid?
> > 
> > Michael,
> > 
> > Thanks for the response.
> > 
> > --- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> > 
> > > The schema is valid according to Xerces, XSV,
> and
> > > Saxon. What exactly is
> > > XMLSpy complaining about?
> > 
> > XMLSpy complains about the stringConstantExpr.  It
> > highlights the <xsd:element name="value"
> > type="xsd:string"/> and says:
> > 
> >  "Simple type 'xs:string' is not validly derived
> from
> > 'constantValueType'."
> > 
> >
>
http://apps.gotdotnet.com/xmltools/xsdvalidator/Default.aspx
> > says the following:
> > 
> >   Validation error:
> > 
> > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An
> error
> > occurred at , (75, 3).
> > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An
> error
> > occurred at , (93, 3).
> > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An
> error
> > occurred at , (66, 3).
> > Invalid particle derivation by restriction. An
> error
> > occurred at , (84, 3). 
> > 
> > I am interested on what you think of these errors.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 		
> > __________________________________ 
> > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile
> phone. 
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 
> > 
> 
> 
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the
> subscription
> manager:
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

• References:
  • RE: XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: monitoring vocabularies
• Next by Date: ANN: GNU JAXP 1.3
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 (XQueryX) invalid?
• Next by thread: XQueryX Schema whereClause like?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread