[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Question for updating existing XML file

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Question for updating existing XML file
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 28 Jul 2004 16:46:12 -0700
• In-reply-to: <20040728232801.KBWZ6195.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• References: <20040728232801.KBWZ6195.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• Sender: ari@f...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...> writes:

> XML has a clear story on hierarchical relationships, but a very confused
> story on those that aren't hierarchical. There are lots of ways of doing it:
> URIs, IDREFs, XLinks, or just "unmarked" foreign keys. None of these is
> clearly definitive. Moreover, XML forces you to treat one particular
> relationship (the parent-child relationship) very differently from all the
> other relationships, so you have to make an early design decision that won't
> necessarily be convenient for everyone for all time.

This would seem to undermine your assertion that XML query languages
prove that declarative languages work for (XML) hierarchical
databases. Unless there is something in XQuery that makes navigating
these secondary relationships as easy as following an XPath, it seems
to me that XML query languages neither prove nor disprove that
assertion.

Ari.

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Question for updating existing XML file
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Question for updating existing XML file
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Question for updating existing XML file
• Next by Date: Re: Question for updating existing XML file
• Previous by thread: RE: Question for updating existing XML file
• Next by thread: RE: Question for updating existing XML file
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread