[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: How important are CDATA sections?
gustaf.liljegren@b... (Gustaf Liljegren) writes: >As XML evolves, I'd be happy to see CDATA disappear. XML doesn't need >any syntax constructs only for the sake of convenience. That's what we >have XML editors for. That's an attitude I'd like to see disappear completely from the earth. If it was all about the editors, I'm sure we'd all be working in ASN.1 or some similar opaque and highly-efficient binary dialect. I do about 97% of my XML work in text editors of various flavors, and don't want someone else's idea of what an editor should do to get in my way. (Topologi's the only editor I actually find useful as an XML editor, largely because it's a text editor with a few extra features that help me get work done. It doesn't scramble my CDATA sections or any of my other "syntax constructs", for which I'm grateful.) -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|