[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: How important are CDATA sections?
Gustaf Liljegren wrote: > What is the current opinion about CDATA sections? Keep or scrap? > > I wasn't doing much of SGML, but I can imagine that CDATA was useful in the > time documents were prepared largely by hand, in text editors with very > limited SGML support. Moreover, SGML didn't have the predefined entities > for < and &, so CDATA must have been the only standard alternative. No, you could use numeric entities. Or define "<" and "&" in the DTD or internal subset. >... > As XML evolves, I'd be happy to see CDATA disappear. XML doesn't need any > syntax constructs only for the sake of convenience. That's what we have XML > editors for. May Goldfarb save us from those who want to protect us from the syntax by making the syntax so unbearable that we need protection! Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|