[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web
Ok. Your email sig says you work for Red Hat. Does Red Hat sign indemnification and liquidation clauses for systems it sells? Umm? Red Hat does not want to profit by the systems it sells? I think your stockholders will be very interested in that position. I understand the moral position. But it has to be supported by business practices that manage risks for customers. No offense intended, but that is how open source can become a credible competitor. Money matters to survival. len From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@r...] > I understand that. The line I am drawing is to distinguish those > who do sell big systems based on open source to the total community. > It is precisely that IBM/RH must indemnify and what I read contradicts > what you assert: they aren't doing that. That is the problem. Huh ? What kind of crack is flowing in that channel again ??? But please don't try to speak for this community if you're not really part of it or don't understand how/why this was built up and successful (not specifically for you Claude, but in general). Money is not the reason why this was built. MS phobia either, those are completely secundary issues w.r.t. Open Source/free software development and success..
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|