[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client in

• To: 'Rich Salz' <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:31:37 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Yes.  I don't know what the experience is elsewhere, 
but every RFP I read has that clause plus liquidation, etc.

I saw an article but don't have the URL that suggests IBM 
is squeamish about this subject. 

len


From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]

So to summarize: you say, based on experience, indemnification against,
e.g., patent suits, is necessary.

I don't know who (if anyone) is doing that.  Maybe IBM is; I don't know.
	/r$

• Prev by Date: Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by Date: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Previous by thread: Re: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Next by thread: RE: Indemnification and Open Source (WAS RE: the web client interface was RE: Two link questions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread