[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Ordinary (was Re: ANN: owl.dtd)
[Rick Jelliffe] From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...> > There can still be validators - they just do not validate using ordinary schemas. Yes, and if the source code for these validators were released by the group who made the language being validated, with a warrant that it was (as far as it went) an correct realization of their standard, it would fill my criteria for a schema (from this standards-adoption QA POV), albeit an oddity (although perhaps the IETF system works a little this way, with the standard being a description of the running code.) [Tom P] Yes, I was thinking of Reference Implementations with openly available code. Chees, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|