[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Ordinary (was Re: ANN: owl.dtd)
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...> > There can still be validators - they just do not validate using ordinary schemas. Yes, and if the source code for these validators were released by the group who made the language being validated, with a warrant that it was (as far as it went) an correct realization of their standard, it would fill my criteria for a schema (from this standards-adoption QA POV), albeit an oddity (although perhaps the IETF system works a little this way, with the standard being a description of the running code.) A binary tool or third-party code or unvouched code does not make that grade, which is not to say these things are not better than nothing! (Rereading Tom's other comment about XSLT, I guess I should clarify that I am talking about standards for public data interchange. ) Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|