Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
 Peter Finch writes: > Do you think that if there was a way to compiler a document and an > open way to edit, query and modify it that people might be more > incline to store the documents in a Persistent DOM form (or the > like)? I am talking about documents, not data that is just used > for interchange. I used to, but as I've mentioned, this is something that has come up over and over again during the past five years, and nothing has succeeded in catching on. For shorter documents (under 10MB or so), there would probably be little or no advantage to a binary format -- parsing the whole XML document into memory in one fast burst is likely much faster than a lot of random disk access. Perhaps there just are not enough people dealing with bigger XML documents to make a compiled format catch on. Building a DOM tree can be slow, admittedly, because of all the memory allocation required, but people dealing with more than trivially-small documents don't generally build a DOM anyway (even if the documents are human-readable prose). > With all the open standards for accessing an XML document, is > storing them in a flat file on a filesystem a little inefficient > (especially if they are large)? We use databases for record > based data and people would never store records in flat > files... but isn't that essentially what most people do with > their XML documents? Inefficient in size? I think that most people just compress them, then uncompress them on the fly when needed. That does slow down reading very slightly, of course. Note that a naive binary implementation is not small, because you need to keep several pointers in each node: to beat out compressed XML, you would have to do a lot of optimization (buckets, common-prefix-removal, etc.) that will make the format considerably harder to implement (and thus, less likely to catch on among initial developers). > Is this a view held by most people? Is compiling an XML document > into a persistent DOM format a waste of time... if so... why? I'm taking a free-market perspective -- people have been attempting and offering this kind of thing for half a decade, and virtually no one has taken them up on it. Like you, I can think of cases where a random-access equivalent of an XML document might be useful, but text-based XML seems to be good enough that people don't seem inclined to do a lot of extra work for a small additional advantage. All the best, David -- David Megginson, david@m..., http://www.megginson.com/ 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
