|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - February, 2003
- XML Catalog support for .Net (and others),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: XML - Disruptive Technology,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML - Disruptive Technology,
Doug Ransom
- Namespaces conformance tests,
Karl Waclawek
- Having to programmically create XML Schema, is there a better way that just using the Document Object Model,
Bill Riegel
- getting undisered results , when trying to display japanese characters,
asim
- Markup: The Early Years,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Dare Obasanjo
- XML Parsers,
Michael Hoffman
- trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype.,
Bill Riegel
- The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP],
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?,
Matthew.Bennett
- Problematical scenarios,
Matthew.Bennett
- Joint whitepaper on XML, SOAP, and Binary Data,
Mike Champion
- RE: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XML for the Restaurant Industry,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML for the Restaurant Industry,
Samuel Dorfman
- New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition,
Henry S. Thompson
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Xpath & conditional filters,
David Higgins
- RE: On permathreads,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- special characters,
monica.coelho
- Call for information about XML-Fragments,
MASSIMILIANO GRANDI
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-02-25,
Tech Support
- Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Matthew.Bennett
- re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Message not available
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Mike Champion
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tim Bray
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Mike Champion
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Miles Sabin
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Matt
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
W. E. Perry
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
W. E. Perry
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Mike Champion
- Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets,
W. E. Perry
- Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
W. E. Perry
- Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
John Cowan
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS,
Joshua Allen
- Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files,
Bill Riegel
- RE: Parsing Performance,
Bill Riegel
- DOM support in IE vs. NS,
Ken Sall
- No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: Parsing Performance),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?,
Collin
- XML for RFCs,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Transformation Error , PLZ HELP,
asim
- Transformation Error , PLZ HELP,
asim
- SAX Adapter Framework - New Open Source Project,
Mark Priest
- Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
AndrewWatt2000
- xml/xsl won't display when used online,
James Rayner
- The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Tim Bray
- Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Don Bate
- RE: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Sean McGrath
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Tim Bray
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mike Champion
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Miles Sabin
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- [ANN] Montreal information for Extreme 2003,
Sam Hunting
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
John Cowan
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mike Champion
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mark Baker
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Lauren Wood
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Sean McGrath
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: XQuery and SQL Server Yukon,
Dare Obasanjo
- XQuery and SQL Server Yukon,
Charles White
- nillable keyrefs in XSD,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- RE: RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Jon.Ellis
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Amelia A.Lewis
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Evan Lenz
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Daniel Veillard
- The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsettinghas begun),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Daniel Veillard
- Re: The waterfall model lives?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: The waterfall model lives?,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Fredrik Lindgren
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- FW: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- pure XML syntax tools,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Joe English
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Tim Bray
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rich Salz
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: ,
John Cowan
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Ian Graham
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Rich Salz
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Joshua Allen
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Joe English
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Message not available
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Kian-Tat Lim
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Tim Bray
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Wendell Piez
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix,
Anuga Laxmi Kanth Reddy
The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
David Megginson
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- RE: Parsing Performance,
Martin Soukup
- Re: Parsing Performance,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- RE: Parsing Performance,
Martin Soukup
- RE: Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing Performance,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- More on Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- Re: More on Parsing Performance,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Berend de Boer
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill Kearney
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Norman Walsh
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
COLAG Version 2.0,
Rahul Jain
Re: Open Source or Else,
AndrewWatt2000
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Open Source or Else,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices,
Enoch Root
XBRL loan applications [Was: Re:Are the publishing users happy? Why not?],
Ralph Hilken
SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- RE: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Michael Kay
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- RE: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Michael Kay
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
RE: Fw: Report to Sender,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Fw: Report to Sender,
Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
Re: XMLDOM Create object problem,
asim
XMLDOM Create object problem,
asim
Historical question about namespaces,
Gustaf Liljegren
"Non-Normative",
Gregory Murphy
RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Google as Big Brother,
Bill Kearney
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Ralph Hilken
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Doug Rudder
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Doug Rudder
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Michael Kay
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Berend de Boer
- RE: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Michael Kay
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Berend de Boer
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Alaric B. Snell
- OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
K. Ari Krupnikov
- re: OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
David Megginson
- Re: OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
John Cowan
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
John Cowan
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance,
AndrewWatt2000
What is the value of XForms? (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
AndrewWatt2000
[ANN] eXchaNGeR (XML Browser + Editor) v1.0,
Edwin Dankert
Full-text search in XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery 1.0,
AndrewWatt2000
Safari and XSLT,
Mike Fitzgerald
RE: BOXED XML (was RE: Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Don Box
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Education XML TC,
Karl Best
RXP test release for XML 1.1 and Namespaces 1.1,
Richard Tobin
RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave,
Daniel Veillard
BOXED XML (was RE: Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Don Box
RE: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?,
Dare Obasanjo
Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?,
Mike Champion
RE: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Tim Bray
- Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Mike Champion
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Tim Bray
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Daniel Veillard
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Tim Bray
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the originalXML vision),
John Cowan
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Message not available
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Tony Graham
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Message not available
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Tony Graham
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Owen Walcher
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Wendell Piez
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Justin Lipton
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
AndrewWatt2000
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jonathan Robie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract),
Mike Plusch
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gustaf Liljegren
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
RE: XML Schema Regex Pattern Question,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XML Schema Regex Pattern Question,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
If prefix is exactly 'xml',
nmehrega
Re: New XML tool for improving data-processing performance,
Shigeru Yoshida
Re: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: Newtool for handling XML in Java),
Bill de hÓra
RE: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java),
Jeff Lowery
Picking the Standard (WAS RE: New tool for handling XML in Java),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: web services stack [data + context = information],
James Governor
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSDM TC (Distributed Mgmt),
Karl Best
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSRM TC (Reliable Messaging),
Karl Best
New XML tool for improving data-processing performance,
Shigeru Yoshida
finding new directions,
Simon St.Laurent
Xalan 2,4,1 URIResolver problems with JDK 1.4.1,
Andrzej Jan Taramina
RE: New tool for handling XML in Java,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: New tool for handling XML in Java,
Samir Kothari
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New tool for handling XML in Java,
Sean McGrath
- Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java),
Mike Champion
- Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
G. Ken Holman
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Wendell Piez
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jeni Tennison
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Tim Bray
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
- re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Mike Champion
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Miles Sabin
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Joe English
- Re: New tool for handling XML in Java,
AndrewWatt2000
New tool for handling XML in Java,
Samir Kothari
RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing,
Dare Obasanjo
Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing,
Sean McGrath
RE: more MOPs,
Jeff Lowery
xml for presentations,
Mike Fitzgerald
what is MOPs?,
Owen Walcher
Error parsing &,
Long, Craig Z
utf8 -> utf16 conversion problem ?,
Alex Ben-Ari
RE: Lame patent application of the day,
Doug Ransom
RE: Udell & Dickerson, good reading,
Dare Obasanjo
Udell & Dickerson, good reading,
Tim Bray
RE: patent application (MSFT)--some prior art?,
James Governor
question concerning parsing entity references in xslt,
Bill Riegel
Please help,
thamy logan
RE: patent application (MSFT),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
patent application (MSFT),
Simon St.Laurent
Serializing doc + entities,
Gregory Murphy
Lame patent application of the day,
Dennis Sosnoski
xsi:type and unions,
Alessandro Triglia
Re: Best way to represent fractional values?,
John Cowan
Re: Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language,
John Cowan
OpenOffice.org Conference (OOoCon 2003) - Call for Papers,
Erwin Tenhumberg
Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language (Was: SML: Second Try),
AndrewWatt2000
Best way to represent fractional values?,
Hugh Wallis
XForms and "InfoPath",
AndrewWatt2000
RE: Re: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Microsoft XMLReader,
Dare Obasanjo
Microsoft XMLReader,
=?utf-8?Q?Marcin_Ros=C5=82o=C5=84ski?=
convert my relational database to XML,
madhur jain
RE: headers (was ERH on Web Services,
Don Box
RE: Different kind of Editor,
Bawcom, Aaron
xml/xsl to HTML,
James Rayner
Different kind of Editor,
Bawcom, Aaron
Transformation versus Translation,
Bent Rasmussen
RE: parameter-entity references,
Marko Milicevic
parameter-entity references,
Marko Milicevic
RE: Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solaris,
Jason Brown
RE: KAVI,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: GML->SGML->XML->?->?->?->?->?->?->...,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
KAVI,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
ANN: RELAX NG to Compact Syntax Presentation in HTML (and XSLT Processor Implementer Challenge),
David Rosenborg
Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solaris,
Jason Brown
RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Dave Pawson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Wayne Steele
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Sean McGrath
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data,
James Governor
XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data,
Chiusano Joseph
Urgent !!,
Kiran Nadgir
RE: XML parser (angry - don't read!),
Jeff Lowery
RE: web services stack,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: web services stack,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: web services stack,
Paul Brown
- RE: web services stack,
James Governor
- RE: web services stack,
Don Box
- RE: web services stack,
Dave
- RE: web services stack,
Don Box
- RE: web services stack,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: web services stack,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: web services stack,
Paul Brown
- RE: web services stack,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
web services stack,
Simon St.Laurent
ANNOUNCE: Syntext XslGen - XSLT/XML Aid for Web Site Content Management,
xml-dev
ANNOUNCE: Syntext Dtd2Xs - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter,
xml-dev
RE: SML: Second Try,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Seairth Jacobs
- Re: SML: Second Try,
W. E. Perry
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Mike Champion
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Mike Champion
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Joe English
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Owen Walcher
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: SML: Second Try,
David Carlisle
- RE: SML: Second Try,
bryan
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Mike Champion
- Re: SML: Second Try,
John Cowan
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Seairth Jacobs
- Re: SML: Second Try,
J.Pietschmann
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Fwd: web service article,
Camille Jacks
SML: Second Try,
Don Park
WAP/WML/WBXML,
Chiusano Joseph
Faster Web Services,
Chiusano Joseph
XPath position in XSLT,
Schaik, L.B. van
RE: misunderstanding of XML Schema ?,
Bill Riegel
RE: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
misunderstanding of XML Schema ?,
Bill Riegel
RE: Resources Redeemed,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
James Fuller
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Rich Salz
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Mike Champion
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Joe English
XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser?,
Jenny Wong
Resources Redeemed,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
SVG OPEN 2003 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION,
Philip Mansfield
ANN: Examplotron 0.7,
Eric van der Vlist
Re: XML Editors supporting change tracking (redliningetc.),
Robin LaFontaine
RE: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
UDDI Spec TC committee spec public review,
Karl Best
Re: poisoned markup,
Benderjgxd
RE: Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services),
Dare Obasanjo
Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Daniel Veillard
- SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Joe English
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- poisoned markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: poisoned markup,
Rich Salz
- Re: poisoned markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: poisoned markup,
Rich Salz
- Re: poisoned markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Miles Sabin
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- headers (was ERH on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Chiusano Joseph
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Don Box
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mark Baker
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mark Baker
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mark Baker
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mark Baker
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mark Baker
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mark Baker
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Miles Sabin
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
=?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?=
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
John Cowan
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
John Cowan
RE: rules for XML?,
Dare Obasanjo
Re: The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven?,
Simon St.Laurent
Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML,
Uche Ogbuji
- RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven?,
Sean McGrath
RE: XML in Real Life,
Andy Greener
HRXML,
vijay
Re: Are There URIs in Heaven?,
Rick Jelliffe
Re: Processing instruction guidelines,
Rick Jelliffe
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|
Cart
