[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SML: Second Try
At 08:16 AM 2/6/2003 -0800, Mike Champion wrote: >As for "just use it," everyone here probably knows >perfectly well how to use it, but we find it a pain in >the butt to type (hence Don's Son of SML proposal), There's a lot of tools that make it easier to write XML documents - XMetal, XML Spy, psgml, and the upcoming Microsoft Office come to mind. Stylus Editor has this cute trick where typing "</" automatically expands to the matching end tag. Since I use Emacs for programming, psgml is the XML mode that I know, but I imagine other programming editors also have XML modes that simplify this. Entering XML with Notepad isn't really a goal for me. >program against (hence all sorts of API innovations, >including yours), There is no one API for XML, and there are real advantages to several common APIs. I don't think we're done with innovation here. I also think that languages that eliminate the impedance mismatch with XML are important for making XML easier to program. >use in high-performance environments >(hence one stand of the "binary XML" thread), use in >limited bandwidth environments (hence the other >strand), People certainly need binary representations for XML internally in their applications. The user community has not yet seen fit to establish a standard around this - perhaps because the ideal binary representation depends a lot on what you are doing. >write schemas for (hence RELAX NG), etc. I really like RELAX NG, and I do think it makes it much easier to write schemas. For now, I am not seeing that many people use it commercially. It would be nice if that changed. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|