[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The subsetting has begun

• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:07:42 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACFB8@h...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACFB8@h...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Wednesday 26 February 2003 09:38 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I agree that less needs to be in the subset
> and it really needs to be a subset, not a
> wholesale restart on the core, but
> it represents a point of view and from
> people who took on the task before. 

Sure, as a platform for debate, XML-SW is a fine starting point. I think there 
are probably a few other such platforms too: CommonXML being one, and XML-SW 
minus all the bits I discussed could be another. FWIW. Both you and I 
participated in the early XML efforts, as did a fairly significant set of 
other people. That alone doesn't buy credibility.

> It is worth looking at because it mirrors
> positions about what a core should be that
> will have to be dealt with sooner or later.

Yes. We've already seen that it's somewhat contentious as it stands. 

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread