[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsin

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:07:22 +0000
• In-reply-to: <3E5CEF3C.4070500@p...>
• References: <OF047F14BF.0A3C2919-ONCA256CD8.00031C17@f...> <E18o4GW-0000Rj-00@c...> <3E5CEF3C.4070500@p...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

Bill de hÓra wrote,
> Sure, but then we'd need Miles Sabin to write the server to so it
> wouldn't just drop the connections the floor because it thinks its
> been slashdotted (Miles can write a nifty server). Methinks if
> anything going to break under high webservices traffic it'll be the
> servers.

Flattery will get you nowhere ;-)

Especially as you seem to have conceeded Alaric's point. I'm sure you 
remember that our big problem benchmarking our super-spiffy high- 
performance XML-munging network intermediary was the fact that we 
didn't have enough link capacity and weren't in a position to switch 
our infrastructure over to gigabit ethernet. A significant reduction in 
message size _without_ the overhead of decompression and recompression 
would have been a big win.

<plug>Incidentally if anyone in the UK or nearby _does_ need someone to 
design/build/advise on anything like the above, please mail me offlist 
... I'm available</plug>

Cheers,


Miles

• References:
  • Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Matthew.Bennett@f...
  • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
    • From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by Date: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
• Next by thread: Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread