[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The subsetting has begun
--- Evan Lenz <evan@e...> wrote: > Indeed. The bare minimum requirements for a > non-validating XML parser > are unambiguous and hardly onerous. I'm tired of > people making gross > generalizations and using them as excuses for > nonconformance, as if the > complexity of the XML rec approached that of WXS. So why do you think they are bothering to implement only a subset if full compliance is "hardly onerous?" It would be real nice to hear from someone on the Expert Group on this matter, hint, hint, if you're lurking out there. Don't worry, the humiliation from being abused on xml-dev only stings for a little while :-)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|