[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access"mean?
Martin Klang wrote: > so do you feel that XPath or the data model it relies on compromises full > adherence to XML? Unfortunately, yes, precisely because it is a datamodel which it relies on, rather than the specification by syntactic rules which is XML 1.0. It is entirely possible for a datamodel to afford full compliance with real (i.e., syntactic) XML, though in that case I might wonder why bother to abstract the syntactic definition to a datamodel before building tools upon it. The risk which I fear is a datamodel divorced from the syntax and eventually not accountable for the compliance, at a syntactic level, of tools which rely on it. This is by no means a new subject for this list :-). I have swung on that permathread with some regularity over the past five years. Respectfully, Walter Perry
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|