[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??

• To: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:40:00 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <000001c2767e$995003f0$2001a8c0@bryans> <200210180843.JAA20498@p...> <002401c2768c$455f07b0$6500000a@KENNY> <200210181203.35481.iandeli@c...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Ian Tindale wrote:
 > ...
> The flow notion is quite odd, ...
> Look at the internal document object model of (admittedly a proprietary 
> solution, but one that works in the real world) QuarkXpress, which is simply 
> a tool that allows a designer to place boxes on a page...

Umm, I *like* flows, preciesely because I don't want to take
up the mouse and place all these boxes manually. That's what
the FO processor is supposed to do for me.

J.Pietschmann

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>

• References:
  • RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "David Rosenborg" <darolst@p...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Previous by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread