[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: how they really feel about XML
XML is overhyped rants are so 2000. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Marriage is the only union that has consistently defied management. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:41 AM > To: xml-dev@l... > > Shelley Powers has written a piece called "The Parable of the > Languages" > that I find to be a simultaneously funny and accurate > description of the ways in which XML is commonly discussed > outside of this community. > > http://weblog.burningbird.net/archives/000581.php > > Programmers of most stripes will find some entertainment > about their own environments, but it's the conclusion that > troubles me most but makes me think hardest. > > [few blank lines to avoid spoilers] > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that there are a few real problems here amidst > the humor. > > First, that XML was hyped up, most particularly as a solution > to programmers' problems. I'm finding more and more over > time that XML isn't what programmers are actually looking > for, once they get past superficial examples. Programmers > are looking for communications tools that require less work > for more communications, and XML sort of covers the "more > communications" among environments but not necessarily the > "less work" angle. We now have an ever-growing stack of Web > Services junk that claims to offer the "less work" angle, but > it seems to have become work in its own category. > > Second, that people think of XML as a programming language. > I don't think that "XML as a programming language" is a > common theme on this list, but I do get lots of naive email > questions pretty much to that effect. I'm not sure that XML > had any business at that gathering of programming languages. > > Finally, to push back on the programming languages, I'm > astounded that programmers seem to have such an impossible > time wrapping their heads around what markup is actually good > for. (I think relational databases had similar problems, but > less culture clash. Tables less alien to computers than > documents and all that.) > > I keep seeing the same old XML-as-object-serialization story > that makes XML out to be an excitingly half-baked technology > for letting programs talk to programs. There's no question > that XML can be used for that, but it reminds me a bit of a > guy who'd written Perl programs which communicated over > sockets using a very readable though simple subset of > English. It was great for debugging, admittedly. > > Of course, I'm happy to admit that I'm taking a whimsical > parable far too seriously, as usual. It does seem like a > good thing to ponder in the context of "XML development", however. > > ------------- > Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA > http://simonstl.com may be my URI > http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI > urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org > <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|