[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Wars are
tblanchard@m... writes: >Based on a couple of other comments like objects "hiding away data" I >can see the reaction against compiler enforced encapsulation. Its bad. > Pure and simple. Public Protected Private is a menace to modern >software development ... Interesting perspective. While I do occasionally tweak public/protected/private for performance reasons, especially in J2ME, my days spent in XML have made it very hard for me to consider making anything private, and even protected requires some thought. One of the key features of XML as a textual format is the exposure it gives to information. While it's certainly possible to deliberately obfuscate an XML document, I haven't seen that done in practice, and there's certainly no compiler to enforce it. Giving someone an XML document says that you trust them far more than giving someone a Java object with private data. Recipients of XML documents are free to do what they like with them, without the distinctions created by public and private portions of interfaces. It's a pretty amazing thing, I think. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|