[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Subtyping in XML
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit: > > That must make rehosting the Egyptian information into new > media quite challenging. Indeed. The Unicode people are just beginning to tackle the problem with a preliminary set of characters (the "Gardiner set") currently on deck: 761 characters. At least 4500 other characters are further back on the queue, and there may be as many as 8000 when all is done, many years hence. > Why were the Chinese more prescient and competent? > Media types? Information types? Cultural emphasis? > Dumb luck? IMHO the biggest factor was an unbroken reading tradition. Any literate Chinese person has a feel for when two different glyphs are "the same thing", just as Latin-alphabet persons can recognize "T" in hundreds of different fonts without confusing it with "t", its nearest neighbor in rendering space. (If the upright protrudes past the bar, it's "t", otherwise it's "T"). But Egyptian hieroglyphs were unreadable for more than a millennium, and this feel for the system has to be painfully reconstructed from partial and sometimes misleading evidence. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com "In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side with the giants on whose shoulders we stand." --Gerald Holton
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|