[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Subtyping in XML
That must make rehosting the Egyptian information into new media quite challenging. Why were the Chinese more prescient and competent? Media types? Information types? Cultural emphasis? Dumb luck? len From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...] "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit: > > Oh well... I guess we'll put together a > tomb robbing party sooner or later. > XML is YetAnotherNotation. I wonder > how hieroglyph engravers kept it all > consistent. They didn't, and it would be surprising if they had done so, what with a three-thousand-year time depth and a vocabulary of thousands of signs. Chinese is almost as old and has lots more signs, but is also more systematic and has a more unified tradition.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|