[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9

• To: gkholman@C... (G. Ken Holman)
• Subject: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:28:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... (XML-Dev Mailing list)
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020611144900.02cd0058@p...> from "G. Ken Holman" at Jun 11, 2002 03:17:24 PM

G. Ken Holman scripsit:

> However, we are collecting use-cases at this point and will begin proposing 
> solutions when we think we have a representative collection of needs.  It 
> would be a shame to begin standardizing ways of doing things before we know 
> what everyone would like to see.

Oh yes.  I just find it useful to put together a tentative concrete syntax
to enhance understanding of the issues, rather than dealing solely with
abstracta.  Nothing about my concrete syntax is, er, carved in concrete.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Data binding as type definition
• Next by Date: Re: Data binding as type definition
• Previous by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by thread: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread