[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 13 May 2002 20:46:35 -0400
• In-reply-to: <003701c1fade$a5f14220$0bf13044@tbp>
• References: <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALMEBICJAA.evan@e...><200205130917.KAA23038@p...><1181819988344.20020513112423@j...> <003701c1fade$a5f14220$0bf13044@tbp>

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 20:31, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> I wonder how we will be able to feed a DOM document to XPATH/XSLT using
> current DOMs. They won't have the PSVI, and even if they do it will be some
> proprietary form for some time, I would think.  Or is the XPATH processor
> supposed to add?  I have been assuming that the default PSVI would be added
> after parsing by the XPATH processor when it builds its own internal DOM,
> but since the DOM won't be parsed, what is the concept of operations for
> reading DOM source trees?

SAX has similar problems, and fewer places to put things without
breaking existing interfaces.  

(MOE can cope with PSVI information as annotations.)
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Next by Date: Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread