[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0


RE:  XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
David Carlisle wrote:
> As far as I can see it's going to be
> a real pain to write portable XSLT 2.0 stylesheets (unless we're
> provided with a switch to put in the stylesheet that says not to mess
> with a schema even if one is found for the document).

As Mike Kay has mentioned, there has been talk in the working group about
supporting a "schema-less" conformance level for XSLT 2.0, whatever that may
come to mean. Concrete suggestions such as this (parenthetical) one are just
what we need to determine the requirements for such a conformance level,
should we decide to pursue one. I personally encourage sending focused, well
thought out suggestions scoped to this particular issue, i.e. what do you
want in a "schema-less" conformance level for XSLT 2.0, to
public-qt-comments@w...

Evan Lenz
(speaking for himself only, not on behalf of the XSL WG)


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.