[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
David Carlisle wrote: > As far as I can see it's going to be > a real pain to write portable XSLT 2.0 stylesheets (unless we're > provided with a switch to put in the stylesheet that says not to mess > with a schema even if one is found for the document). As Mike Kay has mentioned, there has been talk in the working group about supporting a "schema-less" conformance level for XSLT 2.0, whatever that may come to mean. Concrete suggestions such as this (parenthetical) one are just what we need to determine the requirements for such a conformance level, should we decide to pursue one. I personally encourage sending focused, well thought out suggestions scoped to this particular issue, i.e. what do you want in a "schema-less" conformance level for XSLT 2.0, to public-qt-comments@w... Evan Lenz (speaking for himself only, not on behalf of the XSL WG)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|