[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really add?)
At 06:00 AM 4/22/2002 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit: > > > The W3C's TAG is a positive innovation, with publicly accessible > discussion. > > If that is possible for TAG-related issues why isn't it possible for > other WG > > discussions? .... Of course, I suspect that it is "possible". It's simply > > that it isn't wanted. > >On the [censored] W3C-internal mailing list, to which I belong, the >question of open access was brought up -- and shot down on the >to-me unbelievably feeble ground that certain members were afraid of >spam if their addresses were openly published! Spam is a huge problem on the public lists, and one they haven't been very successful at dealing with. However, the larger argument against open access or open read-access is about getting work done. With member-restricted access to mailing lists WG participants are free to argue at length (and sometimes vociferously), and then gain consensus that will be published for the public. While there may be a prurient interest in knowing how Company X argued vs. Company Y, having those discussions open for public view will undoubtedly curtail such discussions, or drive them into private circulation, where the archival value is lost. Ann Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc. http://www.webgeek.com/ What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|