[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names

• To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@n...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:24:29 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <200202181422.OAA04464@p...> <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05573B41@r.... com> <008201c1b82d$a0d2e760$0301a8c0@n...> <1014005493.943.230.camel@l...> <00ab01c1b832$94ce2ce0$0301a8c0@n...> <200202181028.KAA00561@p...> <010301c1b888$7a86c440$0301a8c0@n...> <200202181641.g1IGfGj28557@d...> <200202181659.QAA10641@p...> <01b501c1b8a3$8fb701c0$0301a8c0@n...> <200202181857.SAA12180@p...>

David Carlisle wrote:

>
> Of course things work. I can make documents in that namespace, I can
> query those documents with XSLT (or Xquery), I can specify typesetting
> rules for documents in that namespace using xmltex. I can write XML
> schema and DTD's for documents in taht namespace and validate against
> those. Everything works as a namespace name is just a name.
>

Yep. Namespaces do work. As I said: a URI is just a name. A namespace name
is a URI. It all works.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
  • Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: URIs are simplynames R)
• Next by Date: Re: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread